Recently, being in the mood for something that would leave us wrung out, we 'treated' ourselves to a rewatch of Ruggero Deodato's CANNIBAL
HOLOCAUST at Probert Towers.
It's no surprise that this film often tends to be discussed and compared with
cannibal movies produced around the same time, such as Umberto Lenzi's MAKE
THEM DIE SLOWLY and DEEP RIVER SAVAGES, and Sergio Martino's SLAVE OF THE
CANNIBAL GOD. But whereas Lenzi and Martino’s intentions were to make purely
exploitative gory jungle adventures there’s a lot more going on in Deodato's
picture. Indeed, despite the parts of it that no-one can condone, I think the
rest of CANNIBAL HOLOCAUST displays a level of integrity that allows it to be discussed
in the same breath as a different group of films altogether. 'Up the Creek
Without a Paddle' may sound a flippant phrase to describe these movies and for
anyone who might prefer something more serious sounding then 'Journeys into the
Heart of Darkness' would be equally apt. Because that is what these films are –
worst case scenarios of what happens when often foolhardy individuals with
unrealistic expectations set off into some unknown wilderness. As the story
unfolds it becomes obvious to the viewer, but often not to the characters
themselves, that they stand little chance of surviving as they venture further
into hostile territory. We know that all that actually awaits them is madness
and death, that their fated journey is merely a disaster waiting to happen, and
all we can do is watch fascinated as it all happens before out very eyes,
sometimes in an almost unbearably protracted form.
CANNIBAL
HOLOCAUST is a grim, unpleasant, unrelenting film. It has deservedly courted
controversy and ironically has nearly destroyed the career of its director
while at the time being the best thing he has ever done. It's an easy target
for those who wish to criticise it, and the use of animal footage has been
deemed misjudged by pretty much everyone, including its director. Apart from
the obvious reasons, it's a great shame that footage was included at all as it has
served to detract from what is a biting, beautifully constructed, utterly
harrowing satire on the lengths unscrupulous documentary film-makers could be
prepared to go to in order to get results. Of all the graphic and unpleasant
horror films made during the late seventies and early eighties, CANNIBAL
HOLOCAUST is probably the only one that has even more relevance today than it
did when it was made. The film is now old enough that those who want to see it
probably have, and those who know it would be too much for them have sensibly
steered clear. But if you like your cinema tense, cruel and edge-of-the-seat-exhausting,
if your experience of films from the period has been coloured by the efforts of
Lenzi et al, and you haven’t seen CANNIBAL HOLOCAUST, I’d recommend you check
out the Grindhouse double disc Region 1 DVD release from a couple of years ago
that has the ‘animal cruelty free’ option.
For further
examples of the sub-genre we need look no further than some of its most
respected practitioners. Werner Herzog's AGUIRRE, WRATH OF GOD is the
spellbinding story of a group of Spanish conquistadores who decided to journey
up the Amazon in search of the fabled city of Eldorado.
We know they're onto a loser from the start but it's only a couple of minutes
in, when the camera catches sight of a certain Klaus Kinski, that we know
they're utterly doomed. What follows is seriously great film-making, as the
intrepid group pushes ever onwards losing men and women along the way, with
Klaus eventually doing what Klaus always did best - scaring the hell out of
anyone within a 100 mile radius with his contagious madness, chasing monkeys
and insisting the few remaining members of his band pilot their hopeless little
raft on into inevitable death and destruction. We're with them all the way,
through death and disease, hallucinations and madness towards the inevitable
conclusion, and the film is a fascinating experience that rewards repeat
viewings.
A few years
later, and on a much bigger budget, Francis Ford Coppola would embark on a
similar journey, taking cast, crew, financiers and eventually, once it was finished,
the audience with him as well when he made APOCALYPSE NOW. We're with Martin
Sheen all the way as he descends into both literal and metaphorical hells, and
by the time his band of weary 'explorers' find Dennis Hopper it's clear they've
all arrived at a level of hell only Mr Hopper has probably seen previously. All
that's left is for Marlon Brando to tell us, not entirely intelligibly, about “the
horror, the horror” and Coppola's operatic journey into his very personal heart
of darkness is complete.
Perhaps the
most recent contribution to the subgenre has to be Nicolas Winding-Refn’s Viking
epic VALHALLA RISING, a film where almost nothing happens and yet the grim
atmosphere and unrelenting sense of dread means you can’t take your eyes off
the screen. Slow moving but always fascinating, the movie doesn’t really need
its on-screen chapter headings for you to know that this is a story about a
group of men who have no idea where they’re going or that they’ve completely
lost their way. It’s a testament to the skill of the film-maker than so many of
the ‘twist’ endings that have been suggested as add-ons to the way the film
actually ends are so apt. Everything from the final shot being of an
apocalyptic cityscape to Winding-Refn’s own suggestion that a spaceship arrives
to carry away the character of One-Eye merely proves that that the “haunted
hopeless journey into madness” tale is one that suits any time period.
After all this incredibly grim cinematic recollections, I am sincerely being reminded about another movie, which may lighten up the atmosphere to some extent: http://www.amazon.com/Tropic-Thunder-Ben-Stiller/dp/B001H5X7I4/ref=sr_1_2?s=movies-tv&ie=UTF8&qid=1319097167&sr=1-2
ReplyDeleteExcellent call, Riju! I'd agree that TROPIC THUNDER is very much the comedy version of the subgenre and a very funny film it is too.
ReplyDeleteI have watched Aguirre some time ago on late-nite tv - a few days later Fitzcarraldo was on - and while I find most of its contemporaries, i.e. the "earnest important films" a drag to see this one had some haunting quality. It didn´t hammer one over the head with its intention like Apocalypse does, you actually believe them suffering, not only the characters but the actors as well, and it grips you. This is in another league than the godawful Nosferatu remake with Kinski, which is truly dire.
ReplyDeleteWe've been watching a boxset of Herzog-Kinski movies, all for the first time, and I didn't really like NOSFERATU (the others are all worth watching, with AGUIRRE and FITZCARRALDO the best). I thought it was an odd film for him to think about remaking, really - if he wanted to celebrate German silent cinema maybe CABINET OF DR CALIGARI might have been a better choice.
ReplyDeleteHerzog is a difficult director. On the one hand he had a vision, on the other he was worling in a country which detests vision. But a remake of a movie which in some circles is untouchable was a stupid idea. It is like a horror story, sometimes it is better to not drag the monster into the light of the day. It can only disappoint.
ReplyDeleteOf course it is still better then the truly dire Nosferatu in Venice.
Ah yes - I saw that under the title of VAMPIRE IN VENICE - with Christopher Plummer and dear old Klaus. I agree it's not very good & I don't think there will be space devoted to it on here anytime soon!
ReplyDeleteYes VAMPIRE IN VENICE...I watched the PAL VHS of this in Hong Kong in 1995. OK with me.
ReplyDeleteHowever what I do remember was the description label at the back of the Hong Kong VHS mispelling satan as "santan". I found it quite hilarious.
Forgot to add:
ReplyDeleteI am a big fan of Cannibal holocaust and films by Werner Herzog.
I own all the Anchor bay DVDs of the Herzog films and the audio commentary is just hilarious. Klaus Kinski is the ulimate director's nightmare.
As for Cannibal Holocaust, this movie of all the Italian cannibal movies actually has something intelligent to say about modern society. the last line by Kirkman was interesting: "I wonder who the real cannibals are"
Anyways I own the UK Blu Ray along with the Grindhouse two disc. I remember ubying the grindhouse 2 disc DVD at a convention in the states in 2009(for like 10 bucks) and I remember that the seller really gave me this weird stare like I was psychotic.
Great movie, the docus and commentary were quite informative and funny(Deodato just realized in the interview that Kirkman was actually the porno star Bolla etc.).
Anyways all the movies above mentioned are classics.
On the subject of devilish mis-spellings I think David McGillivray tells a story of SATAN'S SLAVE (which he wrote) going out in one territory as STAN'S SLAVE
ReplyDeleteI would also like to add a film to the Aguirre sub genre:
ReplyDeleteSorcerer by William Friedkin.
A bunch of guys who are wanted in their countries get together a tough it out in a third world Central American jungle and the guys journey through hell to get out hell. Well it does end badly for all involved.
Great movie, better than the original movie it was based on Wages of Fear.