As regular readers of this blog will know, I’m very fond of
illustrating the reviews I post on here with original posters from the movies
in question. Apart from hopefully stirring feelings of nostalgia in those old
enough to remember when such works of art graced cinema billboards (or the
grubby bit of wall just outside the bus station if you lived in Abergavenny), I
like to think that the way in which these films were sold is also a little bit
of cinematic history itself, particularly in the realm of the genre picture,
where breathless hyperbole and ludicrous artwork were often the norm. However,
there is another reason for reproducing a couple of the posters for NIGHT OF THE LEPUS here,
namely to evoke some sympathy for those who, in the days before imdb and other
resources, went to see movies simply on the basis of their advertising. Can you
imagine what it must have been like to be lured in to your local picture house
on the basis of what you can see here, and then to realise what the film was
actually about? What if you’d brought a date? Or friends who up until this
point had respected your artistic judgement? Would such a picture have inspired
camaraderie among an audience who must have quickly realised they had been
suckered into one of the daftest ideas for a monster movie ever? Or would
everyone have made their individual excuses for needing an ice cream or the lavatory
and then slipped quietly out of the cinema, hoping no-one they knew had spotted
them?
The whole
point of House of Mortal Cinema is to celebrate my enduring love for the
horror movie genre, a love that has enabled me to find something good to say
about almost every horror film I’ve ever seen. Certainly every film you read
about on here will have its good points emphasised over the bad, whether they
be of artistic merit, technical skill, or just sheer entertainment value. The
only thing NIGHT OF THE LEPUS does exceedingly well is “Silly”. It is without a
doubt one of the silliest films I have ever seen. Competently directed by
William F Claxton, competently (if unexcitedly) acted by Stuart Whitman, Janet
Leigh and DeForrest Kelley, even the special effects aren’t too bad in quite a
few shots. It’s what the special effects are of that’s the problem.
I have read
Russell F Braddon’s novel The Year of the Angry Rabbit. It’s actually not at
all bad – a humorous satire on nationalism and capitalism which uses giant
mutant rabbits as its MacGuffin to allow its lead characters to engage in all
kinds of political scheming, backstabbing and blackmail. NIGHT OF THE LEPUS
dispenses with everything in that book except
the bit that’s really, really silly. It is
possible to make rabbits scary – at least to other rabbits. WATERSHIP DOWN,
both book and film, actually manages to give rabbits a whole range of
believable personalities, from the terrifyingly violent General Woundwort to
the sinisterly suicidal Cowslip. Unfortunately, NIGHT OF THE LEPUS takes the
giant monster movie route, with the result that Stuart and Janet’s formula to
treat the local rabbit problem misfires when their rather strange-looking
daughter (blonde hair and very black eyebrows) allows one of their test
subjects to escape down a hole and infect the population, creating a thousand
bunnies the size of horses in the space of what seems like a couple of hours.
It also makes them carnivores, too, as well as endowing them with an unnatural
ability to not go to the toilet as much as rabbits are well known to do. In
fact not a single dropping the size of a bowling ball is seen throughout the
entire film, nor are any of their human victims seen drowning in the vast pools
of rabbit urine one would also expect to have to deal with were such a problem
to actually transpire. Quite where these monsters get all their energy from is
a mystery as well as the only thing the rampaging horde eats in the entire film
is a shop full of tomatoes and a couple of people. In fact they end up so full
after the tomatoes they have a little rest leading to the delightfully
endearing shot of a model shop packed with pet shop bunnies having a lovely sit
down.
As I
have said, the model shots actually aren’t at all bad – but the rabbits just
aren’t frightening in the slightest. For close up rabbit attacks they actually
use a man in a suit which takes the film into another realm of silliness
altogether. It all ends on an electrified railway line with a lot of loud
squealing which in cinemas of the time probably still wouldn’t have been loud
enough to drown out the laughter of those hardy shameless veterans who had
stayed to enjoy a quite unique movie experience.
Night of the Lepus is one of the most tragically dire films I have ever seen. It's the only film I own that if I offer to lend it to friends they actually back away through the door.
ReplyDeleteYour review has pretty much nailed it as far as I'm concerned, except you don't mention the outrageous haircuts many of the male actors display. All else aside, and let's face it, there isn't much else, it is the achievements of some half-deranged tonsorial artiste that, for me, lifts this film from the appallingly bad to the giddy heights of the laughably inept.
Thank you! I suspect I was too distracted by the bunnies to notice the hairstyles.
ReplyDeleteWell... here's another one I need to see. It sounds like it's far better as a 'too much wine and laughing at bad films' entry than all of the Godzilla films!
ReplyDeleteIan you will love it. If only there was some way I could beam it over to you now I would. I wonder if there's some obscure appreciation society that watches it dressed up as rabbits?
ReplyDeleteYou just have to love those Slo-Mo bunnies.
ReplyDeleteIndeed! And that weird, burbling underwater noise they seem to make when they run, if the sound effects are to be believed.
ReplyDeleteDear Lord, we've just finished watching it. Given the incredible challenge of "edit this so the bunnies look like they're eating the people", it's actually quite well, done. Except, obviously, there's not a single jot of "terrifying" in the entire film. Shame, that.
ReplyDelete