The movie opens on a long shot of a valley. The credits come
to an end and the camera doesn’t move as we are treated to a wait of several
long seconds before a pseudo-biblical quote appears and we move in for a close
up on the surface of the river. A hand appears from the water that turns out to
belong to a very late 70s fully dressed ten year old boy with a pudding bowel
haircut and corduroy trousers. Sopping wet he walks up the bank and catches a
bus into town, where he enters the local church and gets changed into cassock
and surplice with some other choirboys, who seem entirely nonplussed at this
newcomer in their midst. The church service is led by a blood and thunder
preacher who goes on and on about sin while elsewhere someone is busy murdering
the caretaker of a local (we presume) school, making a latex of mask of his
face and cutting out pictures from a school yearbook of the ‘six most likely to
succeed’. We are presumably meant to think of these individuals as sinners as
each is introduced by a rant from the priest’s sermon. The ‘sins’ they are
guilty of seem to consist of: being a criminal defence lawyer, marrying for
money and shooting pigeons, being divorced, having an affair or possibly just
eating lots of cheeseburgers but not being at all fat, being vain, and being a
lesbian. These six attend their school reunion to find they are the only ones who
have turned up. They are let in by the caretaker (our mystery killer in
disguise) and rather than run a mile at the sight of the apparently deserted
school that has now acquired bars on all its windows they sit down to eat lunch
in a scene bizarrely reminiscent of the last supper. It’s not long before they
start to get bumped off by a killer who seems omnipresent, wears a series of
frankly disturbing masks while killing, and who eventually turns out to be the
priest, who gets to finish his sermon at the end of the film.
Whether this has all been a dream on the priest’s part is
never explained, and neither is why he should want to kill these people, or how
these really quite minor ‘sins’ can justify them being burned alive, drowned,
shot, speared through the head and so on, never mind the murder of the
caretaker. Some of these sequences are genuinely unnerving, not least because
of their viciousness. At the end of the film the boy leaves the church, gets
back on the bus and walks back into the river, but not before slashing the
throat of a choirboy who threatened him with a knife at the start for not
laughing at a joke.
I have yet to mention the recurring motif of having two
thumbs on one hand. Where it fits in I have no idea, but the killer has this
deformity, then at the end we see the priest with it, then his extra thumb
disappears and the boy acquires one instead.
I still have no idea what this film is really meant to be
about but some standout imagery in amongst all the silliness (there’s a scene
on a stage with a giant puppet and The Redeemer in weird black and white makeup
that could be a source of plentiful nightmares) and a really horrible
synthesiser soundtrack where the only noises the keyboard could be programmed
to make were presumably ‘wheeze’, ‘fart’ and ‘burp’ that just adds to the
weirdness means this one’s staying in the House of Mortal Cinema DVD Collection.
Yeah, watched it on third generation rental bootleg betamax sometime in 1982 in Manila. Rented it for like 50 cents US$ for three days and the rental place actually delivered the movie to my house. The rental place was in someone's garage and looked like a drug joint.
ReplyDeleteWhile the movie for me is just the regular fare...I found the opening scene creepy, as I remember, the devil/ghost kid comes out of a isolated lake. While I found the movie to be regular slasher fare(albeit surreal and confusing), the movie was actually creepy.
I haven't watched this movie since I first watched it then.